Mills v. Williams
| Carl Mills |
| Dean Williams |
| 1:2019cv03004 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to #10 Preliminary Response to Amended Habeas Petition, by Petitioner Carl Mills. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 10 Preliminary RESPONSE to #6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Attorney Jennifer S. Huss added to party Dean Williams(pty:res) by Dean Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Huss, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Order to File Preliminary Response and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Dean Williams. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #7 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/07/2019. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Carl Mills.(rvill, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application. Applicant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file an amended application on the proper form that provides a clear statement of the federal claim he is asserting. If Applicant fails within the time allowed to file anamended application on the proper form that complies with this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/23/2019. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/22/2019.(rvill, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Carl Mills. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Carl Mills.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mills v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dean Williams | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer S. Huss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Carl Mills | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
