Martinez v. Williams et al
Ernest Martinez |
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Mathew Hanson and Dean Williams |
1:2019cv03093 |
October 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Mathew Hanson, Dean Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Brady, Christine) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Mathew Hanson, Dean Williams. (Brady, Christine) |
Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE of Service of Order to Answer and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon Dean Williams on 10/31/2019 (evana, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #5 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
|
|
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Ernest Martinez. (agarc, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Ernest Martinez.(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.