America 2030 Capital Limited v. Doe et al.
Plaintiff: America 2030 Capital Limited
Defendant: JOHN DOE and Facebook, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv03140
Filed: November 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Raymond P Moore
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER SETTING Scheduling Conference for 3/23/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/31/2019. (ksena)
December 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER granting in part #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall serve defendant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Scheduling Conference set for January 6, 2019 is vacated, to be reset by separate order. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/31/19. Text Only Entry(kmtlc1 )
December 31, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 First MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference filed by America 2030 Capital Limited. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/31/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
December 30, 2019 Filing 10 First MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference by Plaintiff America 2030 Capital Limited. (Singh, Jaitegh)
November 19, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (rvill, )
November 18, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS REQUEST as to John Doe AND FACEBOOK INC by Plaintiff America 2030 Capital Limited. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Singh, Jaitegh)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/6/2020 10:45 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/7/2019. (ksena)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/6/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/6/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
November 6, 2019 Filing 4 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (agarc, )
November 6, 2019 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (agarc, )
November 5, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) Modified on 11/6/2019 to correct filed date (agarc, ).
November 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400; Receipt No. COX092683). Attorney Jaitegh Singh added to party America 2030 Capital Limited(pty:pla), filed by America 2030 Capital Limited.(Singh, Jaitegh) Modified on 11/6/2019 to add filing fee receipt information (agarc, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: America 2030 Capital Limited v. Doe et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facebook, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: America 2030 Capital Limited
Represented By: Jaitegh Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?