Felts v. Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.
Wesley Felts |
Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. |
1:2019cv03153 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Nina Y Wang |
Labor: Fair Standards |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Wesley Felts. (Gonzales, Brian) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/12/2019. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 1/3/2020 to file an Amended Complaint, rendering Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.'s answer or response to that Amended Complaint due fourteen (14) days after filing but not later than 1/17/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, ) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Cooper, Matthew) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/3/19 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 1/22/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/29/2020. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 2/5/2020 09:30 AM in Courtroom A1002 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Cole Alex Wist on behalf of Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.Attorney Cole Alex Wist added to party Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.(pty:dft) (Wist, Cole) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Colin Cooper on behalf of Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. (Cooper, Matthew) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd.. Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. answer due 12/3/2019. (Cooper, Matthew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. by Plaintiff Wesley Felts. (Gonzales, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6983592)Attorney Brian David Gonzales added to party Wesley Felts(pty:pla), filed by Wesley Felts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gonzales, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Felts v. Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Matthew Colin Cooper |
Represented By: | Cole Alex Wist |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wesley Felts | |
Represented By: | Brian David Gonzales |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.