Conner v. Pruitt et al
Justin David Conner and Justin Conner |
Warden Sean Pruitt, Executive Director Dean Williams, Attorney General Phil Weiser, Phil Weiser, Dean Williams and Sean Pruitt |
1:2019cv03181 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #3 Order to File Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Sean Pruitt, Phil Weiser, Dean Williams. (Crane, Ryan) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/2/2019, re: #8 Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Respondents shall have up to and including January 2, 2020, to file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with the Order to File Pre-Answer Response, ECF No. 3. Applicant, within thirty days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response, may reply if he desires. (sphil, ) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Sean Pruitt, Phil Weiser, Dean Williams. (Crane, Ryan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ryan Alan Crane on behalf of Sean Pruitt, Phil Weiser, Dean WilliamsAttorney Ryan Alan Crane added to party Sean Pruitt(pty:res), Attorney Ryan Alan Crane added to party Phil Weiser(pty:res), Attorney Ryan Alan Crane added to party Dean Williams(pty:res) (Crane, Ryan) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Service of Order to file Pre-Answer Response, and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Colorado on 11/14/2019. (sphil, ) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #3 Order for Pre-Answer Response and #1 the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay and Abey by Petitioner Justin Conner. (Fisher-Byrialsen, Jane) |
Filing 3 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/12/2019. (sphil, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 First APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 1082-6987874)Attorney Jane Holse Fisher-Byrialsen added to party Justin David Conner(pty:pet), filed by Justin David Conner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit Exhibit 39)(Fisher-Byrialsen, Jane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.