Thomas v. Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse
| Devin Wayne Thomas |
| Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse |
| 1:2019cv03265 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #3 Order, to File Preliminary Response by Respondent Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse. (Attachments: #1 A)(Crane, Ryan) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER. Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. #9 , is GRANTED. Respondents shall have up to and including January 8, 2020, to file a Preliminary Response that complies with the Order to File Pre-Answer Response, ECF No. #3 . Applicant, within thirty days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response, may reply if he desires. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/10/2019. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Preliminary Response by Respondent Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse. (Crane, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Certificate of Service Addressed to Devin Wayne Thomas. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #3 Order to File Preliminary Response, Addressed to Devin Wayne Thomas. (rvill, ) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER. The Clerk of the Court is directed to resend ECF Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to Applicant at the correct address. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/03/2019. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 Case Assigned to Judge addressed to Devin Wayne Thomas. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #3 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. ORDERED that Respondent State of Colorado Attorney General shall file a Preliminary Response within twenty-one days from the date of this Order that complies with this Order. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/19/2019. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number COX092836), filed by Devin Wayne Thomas.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Devin Wayne Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Alan Crane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
