Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv03340
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2020 Filing 18 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the determination of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (athom, )
January 23, 2020 Filing 17 Interdistrict Transmittal of Documents via e-mail to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California at ecfhelpdesk@cand.uscourts.gov. Text Only Entry (athom, )
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Transfer Case by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 1/22/20.(pglov) Modified on 1/23/2020 to correct filing date (athom, ).
January 21, 2020 Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to the Northern District of California and Stay All Deadlines by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lucas, John)
January 15, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Lee Duston on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney Thomas Lee Duston added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Duston, Thomas)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond on or before January 27, 2020. By Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 12/18/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc2)
December 18, 2019 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. (Lucas, John)
December 18, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Joseph Lucas on behalf of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.Attorney John Joseph Lucas added to party Zoom Video Communications, Inc.(pty:dft) (Lucas, John)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/9/19. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/28/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 2/4/2020 02:30 PM in Courtroom A1002 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on November 27, 2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc2)
November 27, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 7 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cmadr, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cmadr, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX092966 (cmadr, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 4 Administrative Notice: No filing fee received with case opening. Attorney contacted with instructions to submit filing fee within 3 hours. (Text Only Entry) (alave, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rabicoff, Isaac)
November 27, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Isaac Philip Rabicoff on behalf of Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac)
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff added to party Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Rabicoff, Isaac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Isaac Philip Rabicoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Represented By: John Joseph Lucas
Represented By: Thomas Lee Duston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?