Agardy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
| Janet Agardy |
| Family Dollar Stores, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03381 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/19/19 GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. answer to be filed on or before 2/10/2020. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Family Dollar Stores, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/18/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph James Lynett on behalf of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Attorney Joseph James Lynett added to party Family Dollar Stores, Inc.(pty:dft) (Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jessica S. Reed-Baum on behalf of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Attorney Jessica S. Reed-Baum added to party Family Dollar Stores, Inc.(pty:dft) (Reed-Baum, Jessica) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/5/19 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/13/2020. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 2/20/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3) (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janet Agardy. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. served on 12/5/2019, answer due 12/26/2019. (Kilpela, Edwin) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/4/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/4/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-03381-RM. (athom, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rsams, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (rsams, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7022245)Attorney Edwin J. Kilpela, Jr added to party Janet Agardy(pty:pla), filed by Janet Agardy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kilpela, Edwin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Agardy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Family Dollar Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jessica S. Reed-Baum |
| Represented By: | Joseph James Lynett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janet Agardy | |
| Represented By: | Edwin J. Kilpela, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
