Murtagh v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al
Sean Murtagh |
Levtex Holdings, LLC and Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. |
1:2019cv03487 |
December 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Christine M Arguello |
Nina Y Wang |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Levtex Holdings, LLC. Levtex Holdings, LLC waiver sent on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Gray, James) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. waiver sent on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Gray, James) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Regarding Waiver of Service by Defendants Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Levtex Holdings, LLC. (Gray, James) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by James Lee Gray on behalf of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Levtex Holdings, LLCAttorney James Lee Gray added to party Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney James Lee Gray added to party Levtex Holdings, LLC(pty:dft) (Gray, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Maureen Reidy Witt on behalf of Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Levtex Holdings, LLCAttorney Maureen Reidy Witt added to party Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Maureen Reidy Witt added to party Levtex Holdings, LLC(pty:dft) (Witt, Maureen) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sean Murtagh. Levtex Holdings, LLC served on 12/23/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Smolen, Daniel) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sean Murtagh. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. served on 12/23/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Smolen, Daniel) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Daniel E. Smolen on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Daniel E. Smolen added to party Sean Murtagh(pty:pla) (Smolen, Daniel) |
Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Levtex Holdings, LLC, filed by Sean Murtagh.(Smith, Mark) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/19/19. Status Conference set for 2/20/2020 10:30 AM in Courtroom A1002 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/11/2019. Text Only Entry (cmalc3) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX093150. (alave, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Levtex Holdings, LLC (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney Mark Allen Smith added to party Sean Murtagh(pty:pla), filed by Sean Murtagh. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.