Shaver v. Public Service Company of Colorado
Stephaney Shaver |
Public Service Company of Colorado and Public Service Company of Colorado a Colorado corporation doing business as Xcel Energy |
1:2019cv03670 |
December 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Michael E Hegarty |
William J Martinez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Stephaney Shaver All parties do not consent.. (Collison, Madeline) |
Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Stephaney Shaver. (Collison, Madeline) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stephaney Shaver. Public Service Company of Colorado waiver sent on 1/15/2020, answer due 3/16/2020. (Collison, Madeline) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jonathan Helmsley Geneus on behalf of Public Service Company of ColoradoAttorney Jonathan Helmsley Geneus added to party Public Service Company of Colorado(pty:dft) (Geneus, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jacqueline Raquel Guesno on behalf of Public Service Company of ColoradoAttorney Jacqueline Raquel Guesno added to party Public Service Company of Colorado(pty:dft) (Guesno, Jacqueline) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/15/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 2/26/2020 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2019 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/ 14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Public Service Company of Colorado (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7063170)Attorney Madeline A. Collison added to party Stephaney Shaver(pty:pla), filed by Stephaney Shaver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Collison, Madeline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.