Galviz v. Barr et al
| Mr. Jose Angel Banuelos Galviz and Jose Angel Banuelos Galviz |
| Mr. Matthew Kaufman, Mr. William Pelham Barr, Mr. Johnny Choate, Mr. Matthew T. Albence, Mr. Chad Wolf, Mr. Jeffrey Lynch, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Johnny Choate, Matthew Kaufman, Jeffrey Lynch and William Barr |
| 1:2020cv00018 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 1082-7075924)Attorney Mark Robert Barr added to party Jose Angel Banuelos Galviz(pty:pet), filed by Jose Angel Banuelos Galviz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-E to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons for all Respondents)(Barr, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
