Villanueba v. Roberts
| Dominic Villanueba |
| Roberts |
| 1:2020cv00198 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| S Kato Crews |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER: In his #17 Notice of Change of Address/Contact Information, Plaintiff Dominic Villanueba requests the status of his case and various motions in light of his recent change in address. The Court granted Mr. Villanueba's request to be placed on the list of parties eligible for pro bono counsel and will include a copy of that Order with this mailing. In addition, as Plaintiff request, the caption was amended to properly state the Defendant's first and last name. No hearings or conferences have been set in the matter as of the date of this Order. By Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/16/2020. Text Only Entry (skclc1)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Plaintiff Dominic Villanueba (evana, ) |
| Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #14 Order Appointing Counsel, 13 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, Addressed to Dominic Villanueba. (evana, ) |
| Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #7 Certificate of Service Addressed to Dominic Villanueba. (evana, ) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is cautioned that there is no guarantee that Panel members will undertake representation in every case selected as part of the Civil Pro Bono Panel program. The Court cautions that the Plaintiff is responsible for all scheduled matters, including hearings, depositions, motions and trial. By Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/3/2020.(skclc1)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The Court construes Plaintiff's #9 Motion to Correct Defendant's Name as a Motion to Amend the Caption. So construed, the Court will GRANT the motion. The Clerk of Court shall amend the caption in this case to list Defendant's name as Dillion Roberts, which is the spelling listed in the waiver of service. By Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/3/2020. Text Only Entry(skclc1)
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Dominic Villanueba. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/20/2020. Text Only Entry (evana, ) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 MOTION to Amend filed by Dominic Villanueba. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/20/2020. Text Only Entry (evana, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Dominic Villanueba. (evana, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to correct Defendant's name by Plaintiff Dominic Villanueba. (evana, ) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Dillon Roberts waiver sent on 1/28/2020, answer due 3/30/2020. (evana, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Prisoner Complaint for Service of Process. (trvo, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews is designated to conduct ALLMTN proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/24/2020. (evana, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Drawing Case, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/24/2020. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-198-CMA (angar, ) Modified on 1/24/2020 to correct text (angar, ).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #2 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/24/2020.(angar, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Dominic Villanueba. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Roberts, filed by Dominic Villanueba. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Villanueba v. Roberts | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dominic Villanueba | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roberts | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
