Perez v. Westminster Police Department
| Marco Jay Perez |
| Westminster Police Department |
| 1:2020cv00252 |
| January 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #9 Order Dismissing Case, #10 Clerk's Judgment Addressed to Marco Perez. (evana, ) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 Order Dismissing Case, (evana, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to cure deficiencies and comply with the Court's local rules. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/10/2020. (evana, )
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Order, Addressed to Marco Jay Perez. (evana, ) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #3 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915., #1 Complaint, 2 Addressed to Marco Jay Perez. (evana, ) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Addressed to Marco Jay Perez. (evana, ) |
| Filing 5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Marco Jay Perez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(evana, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Any papers filed in response to this order must be labeled with the civil action number identified on this order. that, if Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/30/2020. (evana, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Marco Jay Perez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rsams, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rsams, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Westminster Police Department, filed by Marco Jay Perez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rsams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perez v. Westminster Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westminster Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marco Jay Perez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
