Sanchez v. Weiser
Erik Sanchez |
Phil Weiser |
1:2020cv00427 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/17/2020. (angar, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Supplement Respondents, by Petitioner Erik Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(angar, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER Applicant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Reply to Pre-Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #10 ) is GRANTED and Applicant shall have up to and including April 17, 2020, to file a Reply, if any, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/19/2019.(evana, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to #8 Reply to Pre-Answer, by Petitioner Erik Sanchez. (angar, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION Requesting Temporary Restraining Order to be Issued, by Petitioner Erik Sanchez. (angar, ) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Order, to file Pre-answer Response by Respondent Phil WeiserAttorney Lisa Kay Michaels added to party Phil Weiser(pty:res). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Appendix)(Michaels, Lisa) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Service of Order to file Pre-Answer Response and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon Office of the Attorney General of the State of Colorado on 2/21/2020 (evana, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #5 Order to File Pre-Answer Response and #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. If Respondent does not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/20/2020. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/19/2020.(angar, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Erik Sanchez. (trvo, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Erik Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sanchez v. Weiser | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Phil Weiser | |
Represented By: | Lisa Kay Michaels |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Erik Sanchez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.