Whitten v. Williams et al
Petitioner: Charles Whitten
Respondent: Dean Williams and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2020cv00453
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION Requesting to Amend Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Removing Claims 12-12 from Application, by Petitioner Charles Whitten. (angar, )
March 27, 2020 Filing 7 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Charles Whitten.(evana, )
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER Applicant's motion to exceed page limit (ECF No. #5 ) is GRANTED in part only as follows. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter as a separate docket entry the Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 pending at ECF No. 5-1. The Court will review the Amended Application in due course as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/27/2020.(evana, )
March 26, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Petitioner Charles Whitten. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(evana, )
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATION within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Applicant must file an Amended Application that complies with this Order. That if Applicant fails to file an Amended Application as directed within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. That the Motion Requesting to Exceed "30" Page Limit (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. That the Clerk's Office is directed to mail to Applicant, with a copy of this Order, one blank copy of the current Court-approved form Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 and applicable instructions, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/25/2020.(mailed as Ordered)(evana, )
February 20, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
February 20, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION Requesting to Exceed "30" Page Limit in Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Charles Whitten. (trvo, )
February 20, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254 (Filing fee $5, Receipt Number: COX094107), filed by Charles Whitten. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(trvo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitten v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dean Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Whitten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?