Coatney v. Mesa County Detention Facility
Damien Edward Bryant Coatney and Damien Edward Bryant Coatney, Sr. |
Mesa County Detention Facility |
1:2020cv00518 |
February 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 27, 2020, to cure the remaining deficiencies. Plaintiff is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to cure the remaining deficiencies within the time allowed, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/30/2020. (apesa, ) |
Filing 4 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Mesa County Detention Facility, filed by Damien Edward Bryant Coatney.(rvill, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/25/2020. (angar, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Damien Edward Bryant Coatney (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.