Jones v. Romero et al
| Christopher Jones |
| No Named Defendants |
| Mike Romero, Dean Williams and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2020cv00734 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER. Respondents' motion for a 30-day extension of time to file a pre-answer response (ECF No. #11 ) is granted. Respondents shall file their pre-answer response on or before June 3, 2020. Any reply to Respondents' pre-answer response shall be filed by Petitioner on or before July 6, 2020. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/21/2020. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Mike Romero, Dean Williams. (Crane, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Order to File Pre-Answer Response and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Mike Romero and Dean Williams. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of Order to File Pre-Answer Response and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Respondent the Attorney General of the State of Colorado. (rvill, ) Modified to correct text on 4/3/2020 (rvill, ). |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #4 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #7 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this order. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/2/2020. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #5 ) is granted. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/2/2020. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Christopher Jones. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Christopher Jones.(rvill, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. ORDERED that Petitioner cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall obtain and utilize the court-approved forms for filing a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (or 2241) (with the assistance of a case manager or the facility's legal assistant), along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. If Petitioner fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/17/2020. (apesa, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 Letter from Christopher W. Jones (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (alave, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
