McMahon v. Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC
| Arthur McMahon |
| Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC and Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Peak 8 Properties, LLC |
| 1:2020cv00754 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/15/2020. Text Only Entry (dddlc2, )
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-754-DDD (angar, )
|
|
Filing 7
CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #6 Consent/Non-Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-00754-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, )
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC All parties do not consent.. (Urban, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Arthur McMahon. Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC waiver sent on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Peluso, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Consent Form due on or before 5/13/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due on or before 5/20/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 5/27/2020 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/23/2020. (morti, )
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rsams, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (rsams, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Breckenridge Grand Vacations, LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7212260)Attorney Patrick H. Peluso added to party Arthur McMahon(pty:pla), filed by Arthur McMahon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Independent Sales Contractor Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Office Policy Manual, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Peluso, Patrick)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
