Suaverdez v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Suaverdez
Defendant: Circle K Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv01035
Filed: April 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Maritza Dominguez Braswell
Referring Judge: Raymond P Moore
2 Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
3 Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2022 Filing 85 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #83 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed in this case on 8/1/2022. Text Only Entry (angar, )
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 84 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang as a United States District Judge, this action is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Dominguez Braswell at the end of the civil action number (20-cv-01035-RMR-MDB). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Magistrate Judge Dominguez Braswell. (Text only entry) (trvo, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 83 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Hood, Alexander)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On June 21, 2022, the Court entered the parties' Proposed Order, ECF No. 80-1, finally approving the class action settlement in this case. ECF No. 81. That Order provides that "dismissal of the action shall occur consistent with the deadlines set in the Settlement Agreement." ECF No. 80 at 2. The Settlement Agreement provides that Class Counsel "have independently determined that the terms of this Agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and that settlement and dismissal of this action with prejudice are proper under the circumstances of this action." ECF No. 51-1 at 3. The Settlement Agreement further provides that "Plaintiff and Settlement Class will dismiss this action with prejudice within three (3) business days after the Effective Date." Id. at 10. The "Effective Date" is defined as "the date after the Court enters an order granting final approval of the settlement and the earlier of the following two events occur: (1) the time for filing an appeal from the final approval order has expired without the filing of a notice of appeal, or (2) if a timely appeal is filed, the final resolution of that appeal (including any requests for rehearing or a petition for certiorari), resulting in the final judicial approval of the Agreement or withdrawal of such appeal." Id. at 4. A notice of appeal "must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from." Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); see also Fed. R. App. P. 5(a)(2). The Parties are hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing, on or before Wednesday, August 3, 2022, why the Effective Date has not passed and why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, or in the alternative, why this case should not be administratively closed, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, subject to re-opening for good cause, pending voluntary dismissal. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 7/28/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 81 Order re Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Class Action Settlement Agreement and for Award of Fees and Expenses to Class Counsel, by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 6/21/2022.(angar, )
April 20, 2022 Filing 80 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Gonzales, Brian) Modified on 6/21/2022 to term motion per chambers (angar, ).
March 1, 2022 Filing 79 BRIEF in Support of #74 Unopposed MOTION for Order to FINALLY APPROVE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND TO AWARD FEES AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL [MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF FEE REQUEST] filed by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Hood, Alexander)
February 23, 2022 Filing 78 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Judge Regina M. Rodriguez: Final Approval and Fairness Hearing held on 2/23/2022. ORDERED: The Parties shall submit a revised proposed order along with their status report that will be filed no later than 7 days in advance of April 27, 2022, and the Parties shall contemporaneously submit the revised proposed order in Word format to the court by e-mail at Rodriguez_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. ORDERED: The Court DEFERS RULING on the Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Class Action Settlement Agreement and for Award of Fees and Expenses to Class Counsel ECF #74 until the 90- day waiting period required by 28 U.S.C. 1715(d) has expired. The Court TAKES UNDER ADVISEMENT Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees. Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom. (slibi, )
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER. Given the parties' #76 Joint Response to Order to Show Cause, the Court's 75 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. The final fairness hearing shall proceed as scheduled, and the parties are ORDERED to file a status report within seven days of the date on which the 90-day waiting period following service on the attorneys general, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1715(d), will lapse. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 2/18/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
February 18, 2022 Filing 76 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 75 by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Hood, Alexander)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 75 DISCHARGED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. A final fairness hearing is scheduled to take place on Wednesday, 2/23/2022, at 10:00 a.m. The Court has reviewed the docket, and it finds no evidence in the record to suggest that Defendant has complied with the notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). The CAFA requires that "[n]ot later than 10 days after the proposed settlement of a class action is filed in court, each defendant that is participating in the proposed settlement shall serve upon the appropriate State official of each State in which a class member resides and the appropriate Federal official, a notice of the proposed settlement...." 28 U.S.C. 1715(b)."An order giving final approval of a proposed settlement may not be issued earlier than 90 days after the later of the dates on which the appropriate Federal official and the appropriate State official are served with the notice required under subsection (b)." Id. 1715(d). "A class member may refuse to comply with and may choose not to be bound by a settlement agreement or consent decree in a class action if the class member demonstrates that the notice required under subsection (b) has not been provided." Id. 1715(e)(1). However, "even if defendants are late in serving notice to state and federal officials, class members may not exempt themselves from a settlement so long as at least 90 days elapse between service of the notice and entry of an order granting final approval of the settlement, as required by 28 U.S.C. 1715(d)." Adoma v. University of Phoenix, 913 F.Supp. 2d 964, 973 (E.D. Cal. 2012). "[L]ate mailing of notices to state and federal officials under CAFA is not fatal to approval of settlements." Id. The parties are therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before Monday, 2/21/2022, why the final fairness hearing should not be postponed until Defendant has provided proof of CAFA compliance. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 2/17/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja, ) Modified on 2/22/2022 to show Discharged pursuant to 77 Order (angar, ).
February 4, 2022 Filing 74 Unopposed MOTION for Order to FINALLY APPROVE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND TO AWARD FEES AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Declaration of Settlement Administrator, #2 Ex. 2 - Declaration of Plaintiff Suaverdez, #3 Ex. 3 - Declaration of Attorney Reynolds, #4 Ex. 4 - Declaration of Attorney Gonzales, #5 Ex. 5 - Declaration of Attorney Hood, #6 Proposed Order)(Hood, Alexander)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting #72 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to FILE MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR AWARD OF FEES AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time, to and including 2/4/2022, to file his motion for final approval of the class action settlement. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 2/3/2022. Text Only Entry(rmrja)
February 2, 2022 Filing 72 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to FILE MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR AWARD OF FEES AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Hood, Alexander)
January 31, 2022 Filing 70 NOTICE and Response to Objection and Potential Objections to Proposed Settlement (Joint) by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Objection of T. Mower, #2 Exhibit B - Submission of C. Luevano, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Larkin Reynolds, #4 Exhibit D - Submission of W. Bulbula)(Reynolds, Larkin)
October 19, 2021 Filing 71 Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings: A final approval and fairness hearing is set for 2/23/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 702 before Judge Regina M. Rodriguez. Pursuant to #69 Order entered on 10/19/2021. Text Only Entry (angar, )
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, ECF No. #66 , is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. The Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, ECF No. #51 , is GRANTED. The Settlement is preliminarily approved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1), subject to final approval. ORDERED by Judge Regina M Rodriguez on 10/19/2021.(angar, )
September 20, 2021 Filing 68 NOTICE re #66 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #51 Joint MOTION for Order to Preliminarily Approve Class Action Settlement filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez JOINT NOTICE OF NON-OBJECTION by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez (Hood, Alexander)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 67 This action is reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez upon her appointment. Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Judge Rodriguez in Courtroom A-702. Her chambers are located in A-738 of the Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse. Her telephone number is 303-335-2170. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01035-RMR-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (rvill, )
June 28, 2021 Filing 66 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/28/2021. The Court Recommends The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement [#51] be GRANTED. (cmadr, )Modified on 10/25/2021 to correct Document Type. (alave, ).
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MINUTE ORDER GRANTING IN PART the #63 Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Set Hearing Regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. The Scheduling Conference set in this court's 60 Minute Order is VACATED. The court declines to set a hearing on the motion for a preliminary approval of class action settlement at this time. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 05/25/2021. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
May 25, 2021 Filing 64 MEMORANDUM regarding #63 Joint MOTION to Vacate JUNE 9, 2021 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND TO SET HEARING REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, ECF DOC. 51 filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/25/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
May 24, 2021 Filing 63 Joint MOTION to Vacate JUNE 9, 2021 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND TO SET HEARING REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, ECF DOC. 51 by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Hood, Alexander)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MINUTE ORDER: After reviewing the Joint Motion for Approval (ECF No. #55 ), the Court finds sufficient grounds for granting the request for relief. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that (1) the Joint Motion is GRANTED; and (2) Plaintiff's ADA Claims (Third and Fourth Claims for Relief) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/17/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause. The Order to show cause (ECF No. #56 ) is DISCHARGED; and the STAY entered on April 29, 2021 is hereby LIFTED, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on May 17, 2021. (rvill, )
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MINUTE ORDER: Due to an unavoidable conflict in the court's calendar, the Status Conference is RE-SET for 6/9/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. A proposed supplemental Scheduling Order is due seven days prior to the conference. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 05/17/2021. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
May 12, 2021 Filing 59 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #56 by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Robert Sway)(Harpole, Jennifer)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting #57 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Court's Order to Show Cause. Parties shall have up to and including May 12, 2021, in which to respond. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/6/2021. (Text Only Entry)(rmsec )
May 6, 2021 Filing 57 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Court's Order to Show Cause by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Harpole, Jennifer)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER. On or before Friday, May 7, 2021, the parties shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be remanded from where it was removed due to the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and this action, including the Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (ECF No. #51 ) and the Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulated Partial Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (ECF No. #55 ), is STAYED pending a determination of this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on April 29, 2021. (rvill, )
April 26, 2021 Filing 55 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Certain Claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document Stipulated Partial Dismissal of Claims)(Reynolds, Larkin)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM regarding #51 Joint MOTION for Order to Preliminarily Approve Class Action Settlement filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/22/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' "Consent to Reference to Magistrate Judge for Class Action Settlement Approval Process" ("Consent") #52 , and being otherwise fully advised, the requested referral is DENIED. Here, the parties did not consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge #11 and the time for consent has passed. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d). And, to the extent the parties may be relying on D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.3 to support their Consent, that requires approval by this Court. On this record, the Court declines to do so. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/22/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
April 22, 2021 Filing 52 CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Disposition on Motion by Reynaldo Suaverdez re #51 Joint MOTION for Order to Preliminarily Approve Class Action Settlement. (Hood, Alexander)
April 22, 2021 Filing 51 Joint MOTION for Order to Preliminarily Approve Class Action Settlement by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Executed Settlement, #2 Ex. 2 - Proposed Class Notice, #3 Ex. 3 - Dec. of Mediator, #4 Ex. 4 - Dec. of Attorney Reynolds, #5 Ex. 5 - Dec. of Attorney Hood, #6 Ex. 6 - Dec. of Attorney Gonzales, #7 Ex. 7 - Dec. of Settlement Administrator, #8 Proposed Order)(Hood, Alexander)
April 15, 2021 Filing 50 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Alexander Neville Hood on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Alexander Neville Hood added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (Hood, Alexander)
March 11, 2021 Filing 49 ANSWER to #42 Amended Complaint by Circle K Stores, Inc..(Harpole, Jennifer)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting #46 Motion for Extension of Time to File by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/5/2021. Because the Parties have already used their one stipulation to an extension of time, this court GRANTS the Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Amended Complaint. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond no later than 3/4/2021. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances given how long this matter has been pending. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
February 4, 2021 Filing 47 MEMORANDUM regarding #46 MOTION for Extension of Time to filed by Circle K Stores, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/4/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
February 4, 2021 Filing 46 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint Amended by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. Circle K Stores, Inc. answer due 3/4/2021. (Harpole, Jennifer) Modified on 2/4/2021 to add gavel to entry pursuant to direction from the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Wang. (nmarb, ).
January 29, 2021 Filing 45 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading re #40 Notice (Other) Notice of Filing First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Reynolds, Larkin)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting #41 Motion to Stay by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/29/2021. Plaintiff's discovery responses due 3/4/2021; Pre-Certification Discovery due 5/24/2021; and Rule 23 Class Certification Motion due 5/24/2021. No further extensions will be permitted absent extraordinary circumstances. Rescheduled and/or continued mediation will not constitute extraordinary circumstances. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM regarding #41 Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Mediation and to Modify Scheduling Order filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/28/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
January 28, 2021 Filing 42 AMENDED COMPLAINT of Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez against Circle K Stores, Inc., filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez.(Reynolds, Larkin)
January 28, 2021 Filing 41 Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Mediation and to Modify Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Reynolds, Larkin)
January 28, 2021 Filing 40 NOTICE of Filing First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notice of Filing Amended Complaint)(Reynolds, Larkin)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #37 Motion to Stay by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/6/2020. Pre-Class Certification Discovery due by 2/19/2021, and any Rule 23 Motion for Class Certification due by 3/19/2021. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM regarding #37 Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Mediation and Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Pre-Certification Discovery Cut-Off and Rule 23 Class Action Certification Motion Deadline filed by Circle K Stores, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/6/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) Modified on 11/6/2020 (rmsec, ).
November 5, 2020 Filing 37 Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Mediation and Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Pre-Certification Discovery Cut-Off and Rule 23 Class Action Certification Motion Deadline by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Van Katwyk, Danielle)
October 22, 2020 Filing 36 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Reynolds, Larkin)
October 16, 2020 Filing 35 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ADDRESS AND FIRM AFFILIATION by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez (Reynolds, Larkin)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting #32 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorneys Tanya Ann Sevy, Abigail L. Brown,and Rebecca B. DeCook terminated by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/15/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
October 15, 2020 Filing 33 MEMORANDUM regarding #32 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Rebecca B. DeCook, Abigail L. Brown, and Tanya A. Sevy) filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/15/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
October 15, 2020 Filing 32 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Rebecca B. DeCook, Abigail L. Brown, and Tanya A. Sevy) by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Brown, Abigail)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER construing #29 Motion for Extension of Time to File as the Parties' one stipulation to an extension of time pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a) and thus no Order from the court is necessary. Defendant shall respond to the outstanding discovery no later than 8/31/2020. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/6/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
August 5, 2020 Filing 30 MEMORANDUM regarding #29 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery filed by Circle K Stores, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/5/2020. (Text Only Entry) (RMSEC\ )
August 5, 2020 Filing 29 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Van Katwyk, Danielle)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/22/20. (nmarb, )
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM regarding #26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 6/19/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec)
June 19, 2020 Filing 26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Stipulated Protective Order)(Reynolds, Larkin)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/4/2020. (bwilk, )
June 4, 2020 Filing 24 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 6/4/2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pre-certification discovery due by 11/6/2020. Rule 23 class action certification motion due by 12/7/2020. A Status Conference is set for 6/1/2021 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file a proposed supplemental Scheduling Order through CM/ECF and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (bwilk, )
June 2, 2020 Filing 23 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Rebecca B. DeCook on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Rebecca B. DeCook added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (DeCook, Rebecca)
May 28, 2020 Filing 22 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez. (Brown, Abigail)
May 22, 2020 Filing 21 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #19 and #20 Notices of Entry of Appearance, filed by attorneys Larkin Reynolds and Tanya Ann Sevy. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Attorney Services Portal Account pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (rvill, )
May 21, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Larkin Reynolds on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Larkin Reynolds added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (Reynolds, Larkin)
May 20, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Tanya Ann Sevy on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Tanya Ann Sevy added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (Sevy, Tanya)
May 20, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Abigail L. Brown on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Abigail L. Brown added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (Brown, Abigail)
May 4, 2020 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. for Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Harpole, Jennifer)
May 1, 2020 Filing 16 ANSWER to #6 Complaint by Circle K Stores, Inc..(Harpole, Jennifer)
April 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/24/20 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference for 6/4/2020 11:00 AM via telephone conference, before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
April 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/16/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
April 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/16/2020. (Text Only Entry) (RMSEC\ )
April 16, 2020 Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01035-RM. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, )
April 16, 2020 Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Reynaldo Suaverdez All parties do not consent.. (Gonzales, Brian)
April 16, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. Circle K Stores, Inc. answer due 4/17/2020. (Harpole, Jennifer)
April 13, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brian David Gonzales on behalf of Reynaldo SuaverdezAttorney Brian David Gonzales added to party Reynaldo Suaverdez(pty:pla) (Gonzales, Brian)
April 10, 2020 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (trvo, )
April 10, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint and Summons upon Circle K Stores Inc. on 03/20/2020. (trvo, )
April 10, 2020 Filing 6 Class Action COMPLAINT against Circle K Stores, Inc., filed by Reynaldo Suaverdez.(trvo, )
April 10, 2020 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
April 10, 2020 Filing 4 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (trvo, )
April 10, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Danielle Van Katwyk on behalf of Circle K Stores, Inc.Attorney Danielle Van Katwyk added to party Circle K Stores, Inc.(pty:dft) (Van Katwyk, Danielle)
April 10, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer S. Harpole on behalf of Circle K Stores, Inc. (Harpole, Jennifer)
April 10, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Circle K Stores, Inc. from Arapahoe District Court, Case Number 2020CV30639. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7247156), filed by Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit D - Summons, #7 Exhibit E - Notice that 16.1 Does Not Apply, #8 Exhibit F - Delay Redaction Order, #9 Exhibit G - State Court Docket)(Harpole, Jennifer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suaverdez v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Circle K Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Danielle Van Katwyk
Represented By: Jennifer S. Harpole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Suaverdez
Represented By: Rebecca B. DeCook
Represented By: Larkin Reynolds
Represented By: Abigail L. Brown
Represented By: Tanya Ann Sevy
Represented By: Brian David Gonzales
Represented By: Alexander Neville Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?