Pscholka v. Gallespie et al
| Daynova Pscholka |
| Ericka Gallespie, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and People of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2020cv01079 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 5/29/2020. (sphil, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order and failure to prosecute. IFP on appeal is DENIED, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/29/2020. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. If Petitioner fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/17/2020. (angar, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number COX094801), filed by Daynova Pscholka. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
