Owens v. Romero et al
| Gregory Owens |
| Mike Romero and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2020cv01110 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 4/22/2020. (sphil, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/22/2020. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the refiling of a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. ORDERED that the clerk of the court mail to Petitioner, together with a copy of this order, a blank copy of each of the following forms: Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Prisoner Complaint.. IFP on appeal is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will issue. ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. (forms mailed as ordered). (sphil, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Affidavit Pursuant to U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Gregory Owens. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 Petition Under 28 U.S.C. for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, filed by Gregory Owens.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
