Bradford v. Community Investors, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Scott Bradford
Defendant: Community Investors, Inc. and Community Investors, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Frontsteps
Case Number: 1:2020cv01133
Filed: April 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2020 Filing 20 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Community Investors, Inc..(Barrett, Philip)
June 19, 2020 Filing 19 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Defendant Community Investors, Inc.. (Barrett, Philip)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER Due to current concerns regarding potential transmission of COVID-19, during the week of June 22, 2020, all hearings and conferences in matters before Magistrate Judge Hegarty will be conducted by telephone unless otherwise requested by counsel or a pro se party. Counsel and any unrepresented non-prisoner parties shall appear at the conference by telephone by calling the following conference line at the appointed time: Number:888-278-0296 Access code:8212991#. Counsel for Defendant(s) in any prisoner action shall attempt to arrange a teleconference with the plaintiff and case manager first before calling my chambers at 303-844-4507 at the appointed time. Any questions regarding this procedure may be directed to my chambers at 303-844-4507 or at hegarty_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/17/2020. Text Only Entry (mehlc1, )
June 16, 2020 Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff David Scott Bradford. (DeFazio, Ariel)
June 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/12/2020. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
June 3, 2020 Filing 15 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #14 Minute Order. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01133-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (apesa, )
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/2/2020. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C. Colo.LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #13 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). (apesa, )
June 1, 2020 Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff David Scott Bradford All parties do not consent.. (Kinkade, Jennifer)
June 1, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ariel Beryl DeFazio on behalf of David Scott BradfordAttorney Ariel Beryl DeFazio added to party David Scott Bradford(pty:pla) (DeFazio, Ariel)
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/28/2020. For good cause shown, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond [filed May 27, 2020; ECF #9 ] is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or other response on or before June 19, 2020. (apesa, )
May 27, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Philip Timothy Barrett on behalf of Community Investors, Inc.Attorney Philip Timothy Barrett added to party Community Investors, Inc.(pty:dft) (Barrett, Philip)
May 27, 2020 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Community Investors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Kozal, Peggy)
May 27, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peggy E. Kozal on behalf of Community Investors, Inc.Attorney Peggy E. Kozal added to party Community Investors, Inc.(pty:dft) (Kozal, Peggy)
May 12, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Scott Bradford. Community Investors, Inc. served on 5/6/2020, answer due 5/27/2020. (Collison, Madeline)
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/23/2020. Consent Form due by 6/2/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 6/22/2020 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, )
April 23, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (trvo, )
April 22, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
April 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Marie Kinkade on behalf of David Scott BradfordAttorney Jennifer Marie Kinkade added to party David Scott Bradford(pty:pla) (Kinkade, Jennifer)
April 22, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Charlotte N. Sweeney by Charlotte Noelle Sweeney on behalf of David Scott Bradford (Sweeney, Charlotte)
April 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Community Investors, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7262866)Attorney Charlotte Noelle Sweeney added to party David Scott Bradford(pty:pla), filed by David Scott Bradford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Sweeney, Charlotte)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradford v. Community Investors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Scott Bradford
Represented By: Charlotte Noelle Sweeney
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Kinkade
Represented By: Ariel Beryl DeFazio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Community Investors, Inc.
Represented By: Peggy E. Kozal
Represented By: Philip Timothy Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Community Investors, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Frontsteps
Represented By: Peggy E. Kozal
Represented By: Philip Timothy Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?