Perea Armenta v. USA et al
Manuel Perea Armenta |
Kristi Barrows, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and USA |
1:2020cv01306 |
May 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: Pursuant to the Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal #7 , this matter shall be dismissed without prejudice, each party to pay their own fees and costs, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/26/2020. (ebuch) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Manuel Perea Armenta. (Meade, Shawn) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, ) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Kristi Barrows by Plaintiff Manuel Perea Armenta. (Meade, Shawn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services by Plaintiff Manuel Perea Armenta. (Meade, Shawn) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to United States of America by Plaintiff Manuel Perea Armenta. (Meade, Shawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7287420)Attorney Shawn David Meade added to party Manuel Perea Armenta(pty:pla), filed by Manuel Perea Armenta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meade, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.