Madsen v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
| Kalena Madsen |
| Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc., Dillon Companies, LLC and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC |
| 1:2020cv01314 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Nina Y Wang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 39
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/1/2020. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 38 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 7/1/2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. On or before 7/8/2020, parties will file a Stipulation regarding the amount in controversy, or Joint Status Report reflecting a Computation of Damages that exceeds the jurisdictional amount of $75,000... Discovery due by 1/15/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 2/1/2021. A Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/2/2021 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email toWang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: NYW-CRD. (bwilk, ) |
|
Filing 37
ORDER granting #35 Motion to Substitute Party by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/26/2020. To the extent the caption in this case still names Aramark Uniform Services, Inc., as a Defendant, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to AMEND the caption to identify Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, as the proper Defendant.(nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 36 MEMORANDUM regarding #35 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Party Amend Caption Regarding Defendant Aramark filed by Kalena Madsen. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/25/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
| Filing 35 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Party Amend Caption Regarding Defendant Aramark by Plaintiff Kalena Madsen. (Carmickle, Rick) |
| Filing 34 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. (Hicks, Ryan) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/4/20 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 6/24/2020. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 7/1/2020 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 32 ANSWER to #5 Complaint and Jury Demand by Dillon Companies, LLC.(Jennings, Rachel) |
|
Filing 31
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2019 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 5 /28/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/28/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
| Filing 29 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #27 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01314-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, ) Modified on 5/27/2020 to show correct filed date. (nmarb, ). |
|
Filing 28
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/27/2020. Upon review of the #26 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, this court is satisfied that complete diversity exists among the named parties, and therefore DISCHARGES the #19 Order to Show Cause. Furthermore, given the Parties' #27 election not to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, the Clerk of the Court shall REDRAW this matter to a District Judge. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 27 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC All parties do not consent.. (Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #19 by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email Correspondence 5-19-2020)(Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 25 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Jennings, Rachel) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER granting #23 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Case Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption and docket accordingly. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/22/20. Text Only Entry (nywlc1)
|
| Filing 23 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify CAPTION by Plaintiff Kalena Madsen. (Carmickle, Rick) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear by Rick Carmickle by Plaintiff Kalena Madsen. (Carmickle, Rick) |
| Filing 21 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #20 Answer to Complaint filed by attorney Ryan Hicks. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an address, phone and fax numbers and e-mail address. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, ) |
| Filing 20 Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC's ANSWER to #5 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Kalena Madsen by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC.(Hicks, Ryan) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/15/20, returnable by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of federal subject matter. Show Cause Response due by 5/29/2020. Consent Form due by 5/29/20. (nmarb, ) Modified on 5/27/2020 to show that Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED pursuant to 28 Minute Order. (nmarb, ).
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of filing Jefferson County District Court Case No. 2020CV30303 Docket Sheet by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc. (Hicks, Ryan) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER construing #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond as the Parties' one stipulation to an extension of time pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a), and thus no order from the court is necessary. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/15/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
| ***Set/Reset Deadlines: Consent Form due by 5/29/2020. (nmarb, ) |
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #5 Complaint by Defendant Kroger Co., The. (Jennings, Rachel) |
| Filing 15 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-1314-NYW (angar, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Rachel Truman Jennings on behalf of Kroger Co., TheAttorney Rachel Truman Jennings added to party Kroger Co., The(pty:dft) (Jennings, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katie Berit Johnson on behalf of Kroger Co., TheAttorney Katie Berit Johnson added to party Kroger Co., The(pty:dft) (Johnson, Katie) |
| Filing 11 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jason H. Klein on behalf of Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc.Attorney Jason H. Klein added to party Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc.(pty:dft) (Klein, Jason) |
| Filing 10 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 9 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT ORDER re: Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, signed by Jefferson County District Judge Todd Vriesman on 1 May 2020. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Kroger on 22 April 2020 (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Aramark Uniform Services on 9 April 2020 (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc., Kroger Co., The, filed by Kalena Madsen.(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Cases by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc. (Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Hicks, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc. from Jefferson County District Court, Case Number 2020CV30303. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7288310), filed by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Return of Service - Aramark, #4 Exhibit D - Evidence of Kroger Citizenship, #5 Exhibit E - Civil Procedure Order, #6 Exhibit F - Aramark's Unopposed Motion Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Order re Aramark's Unopposed Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, #8 Exhibit H - Return of Service - Kroger Co.)(Hicks, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
