Oakley v. Williams et al
Joshua Gallegos, Jacob D. Oakley and James H. Higby |
(I) Simpson, Brody (I) Shaffer, Brody Shaffer, (I) Estep, Estep, Dean Williams and Simpson |
1:2020cv01336 |
May 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Christine M Arguello |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Nina Y Wang |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Directing Plaintiff Oakley to Cure Deficiencies. If Mr. Oakley fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate James Higby and Joshua Gallegos as parties in this action. The Motion for Service of Process of Complaint (ECF No. #3 ) is denied at this time. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/12/2020. (rvill, ) |
Filing 4 LETTER by Plaintiff Jacob D. Oakley. (agarc, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Service of Process of Complaint by Plaintiff Jacob D. Oakley. (agarc, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Complaint against Estep, (I) Estep, Joshua Gallegos, James H. Higby, Brody Shaffer, Brody (I) Shaffer, Simpson, (I) Simpson, and Dean Williams, filed by Jacob D. Oakley.(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.