Rath v. Boulder County Public Defender's Office
| Jacob Benjamin Rath |
| Boulder County Public Defender's Office |
| 1:2020cv01446 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/10/2020. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED withoutprejudice as premature. (apesa, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend, by Plaintiff Jacob Benjamin Rath. (apesa, ) |
| Filing 6 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Jacob Benjamin Rath. (apesa, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. ORDERED that Mr. Rath cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Mr. Rath shall obtain and utilize the appropriate Court-approved form for filing an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 and Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, OR a Prisoner Complaint and Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court mail to Mr. Rath together with a copy of this order, a blank copy of the following forms: Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, Prisoner Complaint, and Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. If Mr. Rath fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/21/2020. (apesa, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Jacob Benjamin Rath. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Jacob Benjamin Rath. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against Boulder County Public Defender's Office, filed by Jacob Benjamin Rath. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rath v. Boulder County Public Defender's Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacob Benjamin Rath | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boulder County Public Defender's Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
