Smart Lock, LLC v. LockState, Inc.
| Smart Lock, LLC |
| LockState, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01479 |
| May 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Patent |
| 35:271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Defendant LockState, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 8/17/2020. Furthermore, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference is RESET for 10/15/2020 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, with the Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/8/2020. The Parties shall use the dial-in information as previously ordered. The Consent Form REMAINS DUE 7/29/2020. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/17/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, and Continue the Scheduling Conference by Defendant LockState, Inc.. (Juarez, Carolyn) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Smart Lock, LLC. LockState, Inc. served on 6/26/2020, answer due 7/17/2020. (Ni, Hao) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/1/2020. A Scheduling Conference is set for 8/12/2020 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang via telephone conference. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976. The Proposed Scheduling Order is due 8/5/2020. The parties shall complete and file the Consent/Nonconsent Form by 7/29/2020. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (alave, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 6/16/2020) to convert to non-fillable PDF (alave, ). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to LockState, Inc. by Plaintiff Smart Lock, LLC. (Ni, Hao) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Ni, Hao) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE AO120 by Plaintiff Smart Lock, LLC (Ni, Hao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LockState, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7308635)Attorney Hao Ni added to party Smart Lock, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Smart Lock, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ni, Hao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smart Lock, LLC v. LockState, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LockState, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Valerie Juarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Smart Lock, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Hao Ni |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
