Rocha v. Otero et al
| Echo Gray Rocha |
| Tanaya Bailey, Michelle Cooley, UNK Mesa County Employee, Eli Stemrich and Priscila Otero |
| 1:2020cv01862 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (athom, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Tanya Bailey by Plaintiff Echo Gray Rocha. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Echo Gray Rocha. Priscila Otero waiver sent on 8/12/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Echo Gray Rocha. Michelle Cooley waiver sent on 8/12/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Echo Gray Rocha. Eli Stemrich waiver sent on 8/12/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 5
ORDER. This matter has its factual nexus in Mesa County. According to the Court's Revised Jury Plan for Random Jury Selection, this case is therefore properly designated for Jury Division 3. Because the jury will be drawn from that Division, it is appropriate that the case be managed, for pretrial purposes, by Magistrate Judge Gallagher in Grand Junction. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 1:20-cv-01862-DDD-GPG. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/25/2020. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/25/2020. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Echo Gray-Rocha (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7355839)Attorney Daniel R. Shaffer added to party Echo Gray-Rocha(pty:pla), filed by Echo Gray-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shaffer, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
