Effyis, Inc. v. Social Mecca, Inc.
| Effyis, Inc. |
| Social Mecca, Inc. and Social Mecca, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Nuvi |
| 1:2020cv01884 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/21/2020. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 17 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 8/20/2020. Discovery Deadline: March 15, 2021. Dispositive Motion Deadline: April 15, 2021. FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Effyis, Inc.. (Licata, Louis) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by William O. Kimball, Jr on behalf of Social Mecca, Inc. Attorney William O. Kimball, Jr added to party Social Mecca, Inc. (pty:dft) (Kimball, William) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service of Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures on Defendant Social Mecca, Inc. d/b/a/ Nuvi by Plaintiff Effyis, Inc.. (Licata, Louis) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11 August 2020. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Scheduling Conference currently set on August 20, 2020 will commence at 11:00 a.m. that same day in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. All other aspects of this Court's June 26, 2020 and August 7, 2020 orders remain in effect. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7 August 2020. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Scheduling Conference currently set on August 18, 2020 is vacated and rescheduled to August 20, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. All other aspects of this Court's June 26, 2020 order remain in effect. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 8/7/2020. Text Only Entry (dddlc2, )
|
| Filing 10 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #9 Minute Order. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01884-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 29 July 2020. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C. Colo.LCivR 40.1(c), #8 , the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Effyis, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Licata, Louis) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Effyis, Inc.. Social Mecca, Inc. waiver sent on 6/29/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. (Licata, Louis) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Louis James Licata on behalf of Effyis, Inc.Attorney Louis James Licata added to party Effyis, Inc.(pty:pla) (Licata, Louis) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 26 June 2020. Consent Form due by 7/29/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/11/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2020 11:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, ) Modified to correct entry on 7/9/2020 (cmadr, ).
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Effyis, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Thornton, Cara) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Mecca, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7358917)Attorney Cara F. Thornton added to party Effyis, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Effyis, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Thornton, Cara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
