Hays v. Pfizer Inc. et al
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Shawn Carstensen Hays |
Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. |
1:2020cv01948 |
July 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Daniel D Domenico |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
Filing 15 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #14 Consent/Non-Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-01948-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Backer, Kali) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Stephen Kirk Ingebretsen on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Stephen Kirk Ingebretsen added to party Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen Kirk Ingebretsen added to party Pfizer Inc.(pty:dft) (Ingebretsen, Stephen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kali R. Backer on behalf of All Defendants (Backer, Kali) |
|
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(Backer, Kali) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kathryn Swisher on behalf of Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc.Attorney Kathryn Swisher added to party Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kathryn Swisher added to party Pfizer Inc.(pty:dft) (Swisher, Kathryn) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Raj Gandesha on behalf of Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc.Attorney Raj Gandesha added to party Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Raj Gandesha added to party Pfizer Inc.(pty:dft) (Gandesha, Raj) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Edward W. Thrasher on behalf of Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc.Attorney Edward W. Thrasher added to party Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Edward W. Thrasher added to party Pfizer Inc.(pty:dft) (Thrasher, Edward) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shawn Carstensen Hays. Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. (Lipman, Daniel) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shawn Carstensen Hays. Pfizer Inc. served on 7/15/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Lipman, Daniel) |
|
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Pfizer Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7369554)Attorney Daniel A. Lipman added to party Shawn Carstensen Hays(pty:pla), Attorney Daniel A. Lipman added to party individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated(pty:pla), filed by Shawn Carstensen Hays, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Letter from Hospira, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons - Pfizer Inc., #4 Summons Summons - Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.)(Lipman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.