Lindblad v. City of Aurora Government et al
Robert Michael Lindblad and Robert Lindblad |
City of Aurora Government, Mark Larson, David S. Waller, Andrew S. Brown, Judy Lutkin, G. Nestor and Michael B. Foley |
1:2020cv02039 |
July 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 Order of Dismissal on 9/9/2020. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 8 Motion/OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations filed by Plaintiff Robert Michael Lindblad. (sphil, ) |
Filing 7 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because Plaintiffs claims are factually frivolous. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August 13, 2020. (rvill, ) |
|
|
|
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Robert Michael Lindblad. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew S. Brown, City of Aurora Government, Michael B. Foley, Mark Larson, Judy Lutkin, G. Nestor, David S. Waller, filed by Robert Michael Lindblad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.