v. Board of Immigration Appeals
| Board of Immigration Appeals |
| 1:2020cv02063 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Deportation |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Civil Case Terminated 07/17/2020. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (trvo, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7388232)Attorney Matthew Kent Barringer added to party Board of Immigration Appeals(pty:dft), filed by Board of Immigration Appeals.(Barringer, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. Board of Immigration Appeals | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Board of Immigration Appeals | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Kent Barringer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
