Scalia v. Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp.
| Secretary of Labor and Eugene Scalia |
| Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp., dba Micro Metals, Inc. and Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp. a Colorado corporation doing business as Micro Metals. Inc. |
| 1:2020cv02169 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. § 0662 - Inj. PRoceedings re: Dangerous Emp. Conditions; by Sec. |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #18 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Eugene Scalia. (McLeod, Tyler) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 23 September 2020. Designation of Affirmative Experts due 2/12/2021. Discovery due by 7/16/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 8/20/2021. Designation of Rebuttal Experts due 3/12/2021. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 23 September 2020. A Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference is set for October 11, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. The parties shall initiate a conference call and contact chambers at 719-575-0328 at the scheduled time. The court expects parties to utilize land line telephones rather than cellular devices whenever possible. If a party must utilize a cellular telephone, the caller must be in an indoor stationary position. A proposed Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and filed with the court no later than October 4, 2021. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Eugene Scalia. (Silversmith, Summer) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp..(Svendsen, Dana) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp. All parties do not consent.. (Miller, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Summer Christine Silversmith on behalf of Eugene ScaliaAttorney Summer Christine Silversmith added to party Eugene Scalia(pty:pla) (Silversmith, Summer) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Dana M. Svendsen on behalf of Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp.Attorney Dana M. Svendsen added to party Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp.(pty:dft) (Svendsen, Dana) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Miller, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Patrick John Miller on behalf of Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp. (Miller, Patrick) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Patrick John Miller on behalf of Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp.Attorney Patrick John Miller added to party Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp.(pty:dft) (Miller, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Eugene Scalia. Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp. waiver sent on 7/27/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. (McLeod, Tyler) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/27/2020. (ksena)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/24/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/24/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (alave, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Superior Precision Sheet Metal Corp., dba Micro Metals, Inc. Attorney Tyler Philip McLeod added to party Secretary of Labor(pty:pla), filed by Secretary of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(McLeod, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
