Kettenbach v. Erkfritz
Michelle Kettenbach |
Kirsten Erkfritz |
1:2020cv02176 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
R Brooke Jackson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re 20 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (apesa, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #17 Unopposed Motion to Remand to State Court. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/11/2020. Text Only Entry(rbjsec. ) |
Filing 19 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #18 . This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-02176-RBJ. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10 August 2020. Due to the dispositive nature of this case and the lack of consent to this Court's jurisdiction, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). (cmadr, ) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by Defendant Kirsten Erkfritz. (Simpson, Michael) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #13 by Defendant Kirsten Erkfritz. (Simpson, Michael) |
Filing 15 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 31 July 2020. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer #14 is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the operative pleading on or before August 13, 2020.(cmadr, ) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Kirsten Erkfritz. (Simpson, Michael) |
Filing 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 28 July 2020: returnable by Defendant demonstrating why the Court should not remand this case (or recommend that it be remanded) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 12 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-2176-MEH (angar, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of filing Boulder District Court 2020CV30481 Docket Sheet by Defendant Kirsten Erkfritz (Simpson, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jason H. Klein on behalf of Kirsten ErkfritzAttorney Jason H. Klein added to party Kirsten Erkfritz(pty:dft) (Klein, Jason) |
Filing 8 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jtorr, ) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 5 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. By Andrew Ross Macdonald, Boulder County District Court Judge on 7/13/2020. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 4 RETURN of Service of Amended Summons, Amended Complaint with Exhibits; Amended Civil Case Cover Sheet upon Kirsten Erkfritz on 06/23/2020 (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages against Kirsten Erkfritz, filed by Michelle Kettenbach.(jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Michael D. Simpson on behalf of Kirsten Erkfritz (Simpson, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kirsten Erkfritz from Boulder District Court, Case Number 2020CV30481. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7401856), filed by Kirsten Erkfritz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint for Damages, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Return of Service - Def. Erkfritz, #4 Exhibit D - Amended Summons, #5 Exhibit E - Order (Granting) Def. Erkfritz Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File An Answer of Other Responsive Pleading)(Simpson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kettenbach v. Erkfritz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kirsten Erkfritz | |
Represented By: | Jason H. Klein |
Represented By: | Michael D. Simpson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michelle Kettenbach | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.