Sibley v. Mesa County Board of County Commissioners et al
Richard Sibley |
Lisa Peck, Mesa County Board of County Commissioners, Art Smith, Charles Bonnett and Brenda Apolinar |
1:2020cv02407 |
August 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Nina Y Wang |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/7/2020. Given the recent waivers of service, the court sua sponte RESETS the following deadlines: Consent Form due by 12/22/2020; Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/5/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang; and the Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/29/2020. All participants for the Telephonic Scheduling Conference shall use the dial-in information as previously ordered. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Richard Sibley. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Sibley. Charles Bonnett waiver sent on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Sibley. Lisa Peck waiver sent on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Sibley. Brenda Apolinar waiver sent on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Sibley. Art Smith waiver sent on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Sibley. Mesa County Board of County Commissioners waiver sent on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Shaffer, Daniel) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER re: #6 Order by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/2/2020. Due to an unavoidable conflict with the court's calendar, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/20/2020 is VACATED and RESET for 10/21/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All other deadlines remain set. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/20/20 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 10/6/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 10/13/2020. Telephonic Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 10/20/2020 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-2407-NYW (angar, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER DRAWING CASE. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock for all further proceedings and drawn to Judge N. Reid Neureiter. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-02407-LTB, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/13/2020. (apesa, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7433147)Attorney Daniel R. Shaffer added to party Richard Sibley(pty:pla), filed by Richard Sibley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shaffer, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.