Montoya et al v. E.W. Wylie Corporation et al
| Phillip Montoya and Cathy Montoya |
| Michael T Kelm and E.W. Wylie Corporation |
| 1:2020cv02535 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Vaughn, Katherine) |
| Filing 11 Defendants E.W. Wylie Corporation and Michael T. Kelm's ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint Attorney Katherine Leigh Vaughn added to party E.W. Wylie Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Katherine Leigh Vaughn added to party Michael T Kelm(pty:dft) by E.W. Wylie Corporation, Michael T Kelm.(Vaughn, Katherine) |
Filing 10
ORDER Setting Initial Case Deadlines, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/11/2020. Consent Form due by 11/2/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/2/2020 (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against E.W. Wylie Corporation, Michael T Kelm, filed by Cathy Montoya, Phillip Montoya.(Vucinovich, James) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: The 6 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff shall file their Second Amended Complaint no later than September 11, 2020. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/9/2020. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 )
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 6 , 4 by Plaintiffs Cathy Montoya, Phillip Montoya. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint)(Vucinovich, James) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Upon review of the #5 Response to Show Cause Order and proposed amended complaint, the court finds Plaintiffs still have failed to set forth factual allegations that plausibly allege that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than September 8, 2020, why the Court should not on its own motion dismiss this action based on Plaintiffs' failure to allege facts sufficient to show that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/1/2020. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 )
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 4 by Plaintiffs Cathy Montoya, Phillip Montoya. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Vucinovich, James) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court has a duty to sua sponte consider its subject matter jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiffs claim jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 based on the diversity of the parties. The Court "must rigorously enforce Congress' intent to restrict federal jurisdiction in controversies between citizens of different states." Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 251 F.3d 1284, 1289 (10th Cir. 2001), abrogated on other grounds by Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 85 (2014). Plaintiffs' Complaint lacks factual allegations that plausibly allege that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than September 1, 2020, why the Court should not on its own motion dismiss this action based on Plaintiffs' failure to allege facts sufficient to show that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/25/2020. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (alave, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Phillip Montoya and Cathy Montoya, husband and wife against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7449794)Attorney James K. Vucinovich added to party Cathy Montoya(pty:pla), Attorney James K. Vucinovich added to party Phillip Montoya(pty:pla), filed by Cathy Montoya, Phillip Montoya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vucinovich, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
