Sack v. Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company
| Albert Sack |
| Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company |
| 1:2020cv02580 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/1/2020. (bwilk, )
|
|
Filing 13
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 10/1/2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Discovery due by 5/12/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 6/11/2021. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 8/24/2021 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: NYW-CRD. (bwilk, )
|
|
Filing 12
Proposed Scheduling Order By Plaintiff Albert Sack (Heather Campbell) by Defendant Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company. (Mayer, Ellis)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Mayer, Ellis)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/4/20, Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 9/24/2020. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/1/2020 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2019 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/ 4/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/4/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Christopher R. Dugan on behalf of Albert SackAttorney Christopher R. Dugan added to party Albert Sack(pty:pla) (Dugan, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER AND ACCEPTANCE of Service for Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company on 8/13/2020, filed by Plaintiff Albert Sack (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company, filed by Albert Sack.(jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 2
FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2020CV30489. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7455295), filed by Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Complaint and Jury Demand, #2 Exhibit Ex B Civil Cover Sheet State Court, #3 Exhibit Ex C Certified Statement of Conversion, #4 Exhibit Ex D Waiver of Service, #5 Exhibit Ex E Summons, #6 Exhibit Ex F Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 USC 1446(d), #7 Exhibit Ex G Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Mayer, Ellis)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sack v. Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Colorado Farm Bureau Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Ellis Jay Mayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Albert Sack | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Dugan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
