Kanczes v. City of Greeley et al
| Danielle Kanczes |
| City of Greeley, Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Housing Authority, Tom Teixeria and Housing Authority of the City of Greeley |
| 1:2020cv02593 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint For Defendant Weld County, Colorado by Defendant Weld County, Colorado. Weld County, Colorado answer due 11/30/2020. (Hegarty, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance for Weld County, Colorado by Matthew Joseph Hegarty on behalf of Weld County, ColoradoAttorney Matthew Joseph Hegarty added to party Weld County, Colorado(pty:dft) (Hegarty, Matthew) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 21 October 2020. In light of the Status Report on Service of Defendants (Dkt. #7 ), it is hereby ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for November 10, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to December 17, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. The proposed Scheduling Order shall be filed on or before December 10, 2020, and deadline to file the Consent/Non-Consent form is extended up to and including December 3, 2020. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT on Service of Defendants by Plaintiff Danielle Kanczes. (Rheaume, April) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 1 September 2020. On or before October 27, 2020, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (see Dkt. #5 ). Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/3/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 11/10/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-2593-NRN (angar, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Greeley, Housing Authority of the City of Greeley, Tom Teixeria, Weld County Housing Authority, Weld County, Colorado (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7456835)Attorney Joshua J. Sanford added to party Danielle Kanczes(pty:pla), filed by Danielle Kanczes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons -- City of Greeley, #3 Summons Summons -- Weld County, Colorado, #4 Summons Summons -- Housing Authority of the City of Greeley, #5 Summons Summons -- Weld County Housing Authority, #6 Summons Summons -- Tom Teixeria)(Sanford, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
