Selex ES Inc. v. Wanco, Inc.
Selex ES Inc. |
Wanco, Inc. |
1:2020cv02658 |
September 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
William J Martinez |
N Reid Neureiter |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #14 NOTICE of Dismissal filed in this case on 10/28/2020. Text Only Entry (angar, ) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 28 October 2020. In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Dkt. #14 ), it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Status Conference set on October 29, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Selex ES Inc. (Kim, Minnie) |
Filing 13 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 23 October 2020. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Scheduling/Planning Conference (Dkt. #11 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall forthwith serve the Defendant. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling/Planning Conference set on October 29, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. is RESET as a Status Conference. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 First MOTION to Continue Scheduling/Planning Conference filed by Selex ES Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/23/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 11 First MOTION to Continue Scheduling/Planning Conference by Plaintiff Selex ES Inc.. (Kim, Minnie) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2019 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10 /16/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Magistrate Judge Neureiter, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/16/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #7 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-02658-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Selex ES Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Morrow, John.) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2 September 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before October 15, 2020, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (see Dkt. #4 ).Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/22/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2020 10:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice: Duplicate filing fee received. Financial notified and a refund is pending. (Text Only Entry) (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wanco, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7465385)Attorney John. F. Morrow, Jr added to party SELEX ES INC.(pty:pla), filed by SELEX ES INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 965 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Wanco Product Brochure)(Morrow, John.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Selex ES Inc. v. Wanco, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wanco, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Selex ES Inc. | |
Represented By: | John. F. Morrow, Jr. |
Represented By: | Minnie Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.