Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Appextremes, LLC
Digital Verification Systems, LLC |
Appextremes, LLC doing business as Conga |
1:2020cv02679 |
September 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Nina Y Wang |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/30/2020. Pursuant to #7 Order, the Parties were to complete and file the Consent Form, at the least, on or before 10/29/2020. Having not received a completed Consent Form, a Telephonic Status Conference is set for 11/4/2020 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. The court will automatically vacate the Status Conference upon the filing of a completed Consent Form. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/9/2020. Due to an unavoidable scheduling conflict, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/9/2020 at 02:00 PM is hereby RESET in time only for 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/11/20 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 10/29/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/2/2020. Telephonic Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 11/9/2020 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX096304. (alave, ) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice: No filing fee received with case opening. Attorney contacted with instructions to submit filing fee within 3 hours. (Text Only Entry) (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Appextremes, LLC d/b/a Conga (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney David Austin Chavous added to party Digital Verification Systems, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ao120, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 1)(Chavous, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Appextremes, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Appextremes, LLC doing business as Conga | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Digital Verification Systems, LLC | |
Represented By: | David Austin Chavous |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.