Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Norvell Crump |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons Administrative Maximum, Administrative Maximum Florence Colorado, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Office and Central Office |
| 1:2020cv02727 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #8 Amended Complaint filed by Norvell Crump. This Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Amended Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #8 ) and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/20/2020. (athom, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/19/2020. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-02727-LTB-GPG. (athom, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/16/2020. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (athom, )
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Administrative Maximum, Central Office/Regional Office, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Office Federal Bureau of Prisons, filed by Norvell Crump.(evana, ) |
| Filing 7 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Norvell Crump. (evana, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO AMEND. The Clerk of the Court shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the Court-approved Prisoner Complaint form for use in filing the Amended Prisoner Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this Order, within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss the action without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 09/28/2020. (athom, ) (form mailed as ordered)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to FLM/Legal Svcs~@bop.gov. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 09/23/2020. (athom, ) (emailed as ordered)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Prisons Administrative Maximum, filed by Norvell Crump. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. ORDERED that Mr. Crump cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to Mr. Crump a copy of the court-approved form for filing a Prisoner Complaint, along with the applicable instructions. FURTHER ORDERED that if Mr. Crump fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/9/2020. (apesa, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Norvell Crump. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
