Barrera v. Rubadue Wire Company, Inc et al
| Andrew Barrera |
| Tom Crilly, Rubadue Wire Company, Inc. and Michelle Bayne |
| 1:2020cv02741 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| FMLA |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2615 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Andrew Barrera. Michelle Bayne waiver sent on 9/10/2020, answer due 11/9/2020; Tom Crilly waiver sent on 9/10/2020, answer due 11/9/2020; Rubadue Wire Company, Inc. waiver sent on 9/10/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service - Bayne, #2 Waiver of Service - Crilly)(Kramer, Gary) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michelle Bayne, Tom Crilly, Rubadue Wire Company, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7478759)Attorney Gary M. Kramer added to party Andrew Barrera(pty:pla), filed by Andrew Barrera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Rubadue, #3 Summons Bayne, #4 Summons Crilly)(Kramer, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
