Quesenberry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Brenden Quesenberry
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party: USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Case Number: 1:2020cv02998
Filed: October 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 30, 2020, to cure the remaining deficiency, which is either to pay the $400 filing fee in full or to submit an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fess or Costs (Long Form). The action will be dismissed without further notice if Plaintiff fails to cure the above noted deficiencies within the extended time allowed, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/17/2020. (angar, )
October 29, 2020 Filing 6 LETTER by Plaintiff Brenden Quesenberry. (athom, )
October 15, 2020 Filing 5 Letter re: MOTION to Clarify, by Plaintiff Brenden Quesenberry. (angar, )
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this Order must include the civil action number on this Order. That if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/6/2020. (evana, )
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Brenden Quesenberry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(angar, )
October 2, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
October 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of Social Security Decision against Commissioner, Social Security Administration, filed by Brenden Quesenberry. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Decision, #2 Decision on Dispute of Waiver of Overpayment)(trvo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quesenberry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: USAO-SS-Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenden Quesenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?