Defense Contract Services, Inc. v. Huckstep Holdings Corporation
| Defense Contract Services, Inc. |
| Huckstep Holdings Corporation doing business as Techwise |
| 1:2020cv03027 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Huckstep Holdings Corporation.(Gardner, Robert) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance by Defendant Huckstep Holdings Corporation. (Gardner, Laura) Modified on 12/1/2020 to (correct event jgonz, ). |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint To and Including November 30, 2020 by Defendant Huckstep Holdings Corporation.. (Gardner, Robert) |
Filing 7
Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 1-25-2021 at 9:30 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to [email protected], on or before 1-18-2021. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#4 is due 1-18-2021. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 10-27-2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Defense Contract Services, Inc.. Huckstep Holdings Corporation served on 10/23/2020, answer due 11/13/2020. (Bailey, Johnathan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. NO SUMMONS ISSUED (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to HUCKSTEP HOLDINGS CORPORATION D/B/A TECHWISE by Plaintiff Defense Contract Services, Inc.. (Bailey, Johnathan) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Huckstep Holdings Corporation d/b/a Techwise (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7528914)Attorney Johnathan M. Bailey added to party Defense Contract Services, Inc. (pty:pet), filed by Defense Contract Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bailey, Johnathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Defense Contract Services, Inc. v. Huckstep Holdings Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Defense Contract Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Johnathan M. Bailey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Huckstep Holdings Corporation doing business as Techwise | |
| Represented By: | Robert Stewart Gardner |
| Represented By: | Laura Anne Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
