Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc. v. Leuenberger et al
| Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc. |
| Daniel Leuenberger, Cristian Mendoza-Guillen, Mario Mendoza, Severo Vazquez-Juarez and Jose Mendoza-Delgado |
| 1:2020cv03127 |
| October 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance Kirsten Z. Myers by Kirsten Z. Myers on behalf of Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc. (Myers, Kirsten) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc. against Daniel Leuenberger, Mario Mendoza, Jose Mendoza-Delgado, Cristian Mendoza-Guillen, Severo Vazquez-Juarez (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7545963)Attorney Sean Patrick Paris added to party Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Arrowhead Landscape Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #3 Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #4 Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #5 Summons Summons in a Civil Action, #6 Summons Summons in a Civil Action)(Paris, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
