Doe et al v. Boulder Valley School District
Joost Schreve and John Doe |
Boulder Valley School District |
1:2020cv03141 |
October 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. The Court notes this is Defendant's first request for an extension of time and therefore will GRANT Defendant's Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. However, the Court cautions Defendant that going forward press of business and delays associated with Covid-19 will not be considered good cause and any future motions for extension of time must have exceedingly good cause. Boulder Valley School District answer due 1/4/2021. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 12-17-2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2). |
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Defendant Boulder Valley School District. (Montgomery, Robert) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiffs John Doe, Joost Schreve. (Raykin, Igor) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Boulder Valley School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Montgomery, Robert) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Doe, Joost Schreve. Boulder Valley School District waiver sent on 10/22/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Raykin, Igor) |
Filing 7 Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 1/6/2021 at 11:00 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 12/30/2020. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#3-1] is due 12/30/202. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 10-26-2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Robert P. Montgomery by Robert P. Montgomery on behalf of Boulder Valley School DistrictAttorney Robert P. Montgomery added to party Boulder Valley School District(pty:dft) (Montgomery, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Holly E. Ortiz by Holly Eileen Ortiz on behalf of Boulder Valley School DistrictAttorney Holly Eileen Ortiz added to party Boulder Valley School District(pty:dft) (Ortiz, Holly) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Michael Brent Case by Michael Brent Case on behalf of Boulder Valley School DistrictAttorney Michael Brent Case added to party Boulder Valley School District(pty:dft) (Case, Michael) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Boulder Valley School District (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7548241)Attorney Igor Raykin added to party C. D.(pty:pla), Attorney Igor Raykin added to party F. S.(pty:pla), filed by C. D., F. S.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons in a Civil Action)(Raykin, Igor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.