Kovacs v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Kovacs
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv03180
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Lynn Pope on behalf of G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.Attorney Jennifer Lynn Pope added to party G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.(pty:dft) (Pope, Jennifer)
December 9, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Abby E. Chermely on behalf of G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.Attorney Abby E. Chermely added to party G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.(pty:dft) (Chermely, Abby)
November 23, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Travis Mihelick on behalf of G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.Attorney John Travis Mihelick added to party G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.(pty:dft) (Mihelick, John)
November 19, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jeffrey J. Moyle on behalf of Jacqueline KovacsAttorney Jeffrey J. Moyle added to party Jacqueline Kovacs(pty:pla) (Moyle, Jeffrey)
November 18, 2020 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
November 18, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Kelly E. Eisenlohr-Moul added to party G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.(pty:dft) by G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc..(Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
November 12, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacqueline Kovacs. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. (Nilges, Hans)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Setting Initial Case Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/26/2020. Consent Form due by 12/22/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/22/2020 (evaug)
October 23, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
October 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7555646)Attorney Hans A. Nilges added to party Jacqueline Kovacs(pty:pla), filed by Jacqueline Kovacs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A-Consent of Jacqueline Kovacs)(Nilges, Hans)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kovacs v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Kovacs
Represented By: Hans A. Nilges
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Moyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Pope
Represented By: John Travis Mihelick
Represented By: Kelly E. Eisenlohr-Moul
Represented By: Abby E. Chermely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?