Gielissen v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Dana Gielissen
Defendant: Matrix Absence Management, Inc. and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2020cv03213
Filed: October 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03213-LTB-MEH. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 16 December 2020. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #10 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
December 15, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Dana Gielissen All parties do not consent.. (Martinez, Esteban)
November 20, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joshua Bachrach on behalf of Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyAttorney Joshua Bachrach added to party Matrix Absence Management, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Joshua Bachrach added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Bachrach, Joshua)
November 18, 2020 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, Attorney Scott Douglas Sweeney added to party Matrix Absence Management, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Scott Douglas Sweeney added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Sweeney, Scott)
October 30, 2020 Filing 7 Conventionally Submitted Material : 1 CD containing Exhibits 2 and 3 to #1 by Plaintiff Dana Gielissen Text Only Entry (cmadr, )
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 28 October 2020. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF #5 ) on or before December 15, 2020. It is ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held on January 4, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/28/2020. (cmadr, ) Modified to correct entry on 10/30/2020 (cmadr, ).
October 28, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX096900. (alave, )
October 28, 2020 Filing 2 Administrative Notice: No filing fee received with case opening. Attorney contacted with instructions to submit filing fee within 3 hours. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, )
October 27, 2020 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (jsalz, )
October 27, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, )
October 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney James Norman West added to party Dana Gielissen(pty:pla), filed by Dana Gielissen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 NOTICE OF A LAWSUIT AND REQUEST TO WAIVE SERVICE OF A SUMMONS, #3 WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS - copy, #4 Physical Exhibit Cover Sheet, #5 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 1 of 6), #6 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 2 of 6), #7 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 3 of 6), #8 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 4 of 6), #9 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 5 of 6), #10 Preliminary Record Exhibit 1 (part 6 of 6), #11 Preliminary Record Exhibit 4 (part 1 of 5), #12 Preliminary Record Exhibit 4 (part 2 of 5), #13 Preliminary Record Exhibit 4 (part 3 of 5), #14 Preliminary Record Exhibit 4 (part 4 of 5), #15 Preliminary Record Exhibit 4 (part 5 of 5))(West, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gielissen v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana Gielissen
Represented By: James Norman West
Represented By: Esteban Anthony Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrix Absence Management, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua Bachrach
Represented By: Scott Douglas Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Joshua Bachrach
Represented By: Scott Douglas Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?