McNaney v. Dillon Companies, LLC
Tish McNaney |
Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers |
1:2020cv03307 |
November 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
N Reid Neureiter |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER Referring Case Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636( c). The above action is referred for disposition to the Magistrate Judge currently assigned to the case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636( c). All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03307-NRN, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on December 28, 2020. (rvill, ) |
Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Tish McNaney All parties consent.. (Blair, Jolene) |
Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Tish McNaney. (Blair, Jolene) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance Troy Ukasick by Jolene Carman Blair on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Blair, Jolene) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 20 November 2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/12/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 1/19/2021 10:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/20/2020. (ebuch) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jolene Carman Blair on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Jolene Carman Blair added to party Tish McNaney(pty:pla) (Blair, Jolene) |
Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to #5 Complaint and Jury Demand by Dillon Companies, LLC.(Johnson, Katie) |
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (alave, ) |
Filing 8 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
Filing 7 STATE COURT ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Two Week Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Dillon Companies, LLC. By District Court Judge, Weld County, on 10/30/2020. (alave, ) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Civil Summons and Civil Complaint and Jury Demand upon Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers on 10/08/2020. (alave, ) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Dillon Companies, LLC, filed by Tish McNaney.(alave, ) |
Filing 4 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (alave, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katie Berit Johnson on behalf of Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King SoopersAttorney Katie Berit Johnson added to party Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers(pty:dft) (Johnson, Katie) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Reece, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers from Weld County District Court, Case Number 2020CV030700. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7575881), filed by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - State Summons, #4 Exhibit D- State CMO, #5 Exhibit E - State Order Striking Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit F- State Revised Cover Sheet, #7 Exhibit G - State Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint, #8 Exhibit H - State Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint, #9 Exhibit I - State Order Granting Extension Respond Complaint, #10 Exhibit J - State Aff. Service, #11 Exhibit K - Sec. State Dillon Info, #12 Exhibit L - Sec State Kroger Info, #13 Exhibit M - State N. Intent Remove, #14 Exhibit N - State Register of Actions, #15 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Reece, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McNaney v. Dillon Companies, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers | |
Represented By: | Katie Berit Johnson |
Represented By: | Eric C. Reece |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tish McNaney | |
Represented By: | Jolene Carman Blair |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.