Apuzzo v. Swope
Plaintiff: Angela Apuzzo
Defendant: Roddy Swope
Case Number: 1:2020cv03377
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/11/2021. ORDERED that, on or before January 25, 2021, defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded due to the Court's lack of subject matterjurisdiction. (sphil, )
January 8, 2021 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03377-PAB. (athom, )
January 7, 2021 Filing 14 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #13 Non-Consent Form. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03377-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, )
January 5, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE NON CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Defendant Roddy Swope (Dagner, Deana)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. Given the unopposed nature of the Motion, the Court finds good cause to GRANT Plaintiff's Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is reset for 1-25-2021 at 10:00 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 1-18-2021. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#6] is due 1-18-2021. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 12-10-2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
December 10, 2020 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Continue to Reschedule Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Angela Apuzzo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(Hart, Elizabeth)
December 9, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by James Todd Tenge on behalf of Angela ApuzzoAttorney James Todd Tenge added to party Angela Apuzzo(pty:pla) (Tenge, James)
December 9, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Elizabeth Ashley Hart on behalf of Angela ApuzzoAttorney Elizabeth Ashley Hart added to party Angela Apuzzo(pty:pla) (Hart, Elizabeth)
November 20, 2020 Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Complaint and Jury Demand by Roddy Swope.(Dagner, Deana)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 1-11-2021 at 11:00 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 1-4-2021. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#6] is due 1-4-2021. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11-13-2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
November 13, 2020 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jtorr, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint and Jury Demand upon Roddy Swope on 10/18/2020. (jtorr, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 3 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Roddy Swope, filed by Angela Apuzzo.(jtorr, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Roddy Swope from Larimer District Court, Case Number 2020CV30673. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7586719), filed by Roddy Swope. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Dagner, Deana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apuzzo v. Swope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roddy Swope
Represented By: Deana R. Dagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Apuzzo
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Hart
Represented By: James T. Tenge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?